Lentis/Tasers and Stun Guns – Wikibooks, open books for an open world


As stun weapons and tasers turn out to be extra frequent amongst police, army, and on a regular basis customers, you will need to perceive the interface between these gadgets and society. This chapter outlines a quick, social analysis of the developmental historical past of those non-lethal weapons and explains the importance of present variations. It then examines the continuing debate over taser/stun gun utilization by taking a look at related social teams concerned. Additionally included is a fast have a look at the affect of viral movies by way of consumer sharing video channels similar to Youtube, which exacerbates stigmas related to electroshock gadgets.

Historical past[edit]

Early electrical cattle prod

The primary concept for utilizing electrical energy in a non-lethal style will be traced again to 1852, from US Patent 8843[1] an ‘Electrical Whaling Equipment.’ This preceded the electrical chair, after which using non-lethal electrical gadgets for torture manifested in such kinds because the Picana Electrica, utilized in Argentina within the 1930’s.[2] The electrical cattle prod, invented by John M. Burton in 1890, turned broadly common within the Americas within the 1940’s.[2][3] Within the 1950’s, this advanced into the primary stun gadgets for private safety. The “Electrified Stick for Postmen” was a stun baton that was tailored for police use within the 1960’s for prisoner and riot management.[4] Within the early 1970’s, the primary trendy ranged w:Electroshock_weapon had been marketed to the general public.[2] The concept for a ranged shock system, the taser, originated from the fictional novel, Tom Swift and his Electrical Rifle, the place Mr. Swift used a rifle that fired bolts of electrical energy. This impressed NASA researcher, Jack Cowl. Cowl went on to invent the taser in 1972 and later shaped TASER Worldwide, the most typical maker of electroshock weapons.[5] John Cowl’s patent was tailored by Nova Applied sciences in 1983 for the Nova XR-5000, their first non-projectile hand-held type stun gun. [6]. The XR-5000 design was broadly copied because the supply for the compact non-projectile handheld stun gun used in the present day.

Mannequin Variations[edit]

Normal Taser utilized by police and army

Stun weapons vs. Tasers[edit]

Each are electroshock weapons that apply a non-lethal present to stimulate uncontrollable muscle operate and subdue an individual. A stun gun applies a cost to the physique when the 2 electrodes are in shut proximity with the pores and skin. A taser propels two electrodes on conductive wires by way of the air when fired. These electrodes embed themselves into the goal’s pores and skin earlier than the shock. Counter-intuitively, it is the taser that shoots not the stun gun.

Hid Variations[edit]

Stun weapons’ client market expanded with the evolution of a line of hid designs. These self protection weapons tackle a complete new facet of peculiar your attacker. These weapons are disguised as cell telephones, flash lights, pens, even lipstick tubes. This decreases the possibility for a would-be attacker to anticipate a counter-attack. It additionally creates a hierarchy of benefits: individuals might worth revenge by way of shock on an assailant greater than the power to preemptively dissuade attackers by displaying an apparent weapon.

Dangers Related to Tasers[edit]

The excessive voltage related to tasers could cause some people to enter cardiac arrest.[7] This has warped the general public’s view since tasers can do greater than subdue. They’ve the potential to kill. People with pre-existing situations are below increased danger. Even cops and troopers who’re tased as aside of their coaching have filed lawsuits in opposition to taser firms citing lasting accidents.[8] In conditions through which people are wholesome, calm, and relaxed, tasers are normally protected. Nonetheless, as many viral movies on the web current, people which are tased by police are by no means in that state.[9] There are claims with vital proof of danger of damage or demise, whereas others research vouch for taser security.[10]

Social Teams[edit]


Tasers had been applied to supply police a brand new various to subdue suspects. The aim was to scale back firearm use. In Pittsburgh, PA, taser use elevated from 274 in 2005 to 332 in 2006. Using firearms in opposition to suspects decreased from 14 to six over the identical interval.[11] That is certainly one of many examples of lowered gun use.

Though the police supposed tasers to scale back firearm use, critics disapprove of the conditions through which police justify taser utilization. It’s potential that officers are needlessly utilizing tasers, and are overcompensating for the lower in gun incidents. In Minneapolis, MN, tasers had been used 232 occasions in 2006, a 75% enhance from 2005.[12] Critics say that law enforcement officials now not strive alternate options similar to reasoning with a suspect to defuse conditions however as an alternative use a taser as a main technique of gaining management.

Stun Gun disguised as a mobile phone

British police pointers name for tasers for use preemptively in any case through which a suspect poses a menace, even when they’re unarmed.[13] Previously, tasers have historically been fired when a suspect has a weapon, however extra officers are tasing people who’re unarmed. In San Antonio, TX, from 2006 to January 2008, of 99 taser functions, police incorrectly believed the person to be armed in 40 instances.[14] Police are now not warning people of use, however are stunning them as an alternative. Supporters of electroshock weapons declare that tasers are more practical than typical strategies of gaining management of a scenario, i.e., pepper spray, batons, and many others.[15]

Medical Career[edit]

Whereas medical professionals urge warning when utilizing the taser, a number of potential research have failed to seek out any unfavorable cardiac impression. Nonetheless, some case stories have documented a handful of related accidents. Docs stress using tasers by educated and skilled people and don’t promote using tasers in any scenario that doesn’t warrant using in any other case excessive power.[16]

American Civil Liberties Union[edit]

The American Civil Liberties Union claims that from 1999, roughly 148 individuals have died in the USA and Canada because of a taser shock. The best drawback regarding tasers in line with the ACLU is the truth that police can use them and aren’t topic to some type of regulation or management. They’re additionally not restricted to the variety of occasions they use the system per suspect. [17]

Taser Worldwide and Division of Protection[edit]

Taser Worldwide (T.I.), with its vested curiosity in its product, references peer-reviewed analysis articles and statistics vouching for taser security. A latest examine, marketed extremely by the corporate, claims that “99% of topics don’t expertise vital accidents after carried out electrical weapon use.”[10] Taser Worldwide works intently with the Division of Protection as a weapons contractor. It’s within the DoD’s curiosity for T.I. merchandise to be considered as protected. T.I. has ‘welcomed’ impartial research on taser security sponsored by the DoD.[18] The 2 teams will foreseeably proceed their working relationship and collectively develop new weapons.

United Nations and Amnesty Worldwide[edit]

Each the United Nations and Amnesty Worldwide are the most important voices to be heard talking out in opposition to the utilization of tasers. Though tasers aren’t as deadly as firearms, in lots of instances from 2001-2008, tasers have led to the deaths of 334 people. The teams cite the gadgets as a way of torture and never as a way of suppression. Each teams declare that police and different customers can revert to safer alternate options with the identical efficacy.[19].

Affect of Web Movies[edit]

Because the introduction of the web, social views have been influenced from a wide range of open sources. One supply, YouTube, which hosts consumer generated movies, has modified the general public’s notion of tasers because of the viral video phenomenon. The pervasive nature of the web in our lives makes the propagation and recognition of those movies efficient at molding individuals’s ideas. These clips current tasers as contrastingly harmful and humorous. One can hypothesize that their reputation is because of the excessive nature of how tasers are utilized in conditions involving close to demise experiences or ones that make us chuckle.

Well-liked Police Circumstances[edit]

On September 17, 2007, Andrew William Meyer was tased by police at a College of Florida discussion board through which John Kerry was a visitor speaker. Meyer requested an inappropriate query, then resisted police who had been making an attempt to escort him off the premises. His pleas and cries for assist are both comical or chilling, relying on the viewer’s response. His catch phrase “Do not tase me bro!” has turn out to be part of popular culture. This incident was caught on tape and has greater than 5.25 million views.

On Could 11, 2009, Kathryn Winkfein was pulled over for rushing. After she refused to cooperate, Deputy Constable Christopher Beize tasered her. Her groans as she falls on the bottom are chilling attributable to her outdated age. This police dashboard-camera video was launched to the general public and has greater than 1 million views in complete.

In distinction, fewer individuals have seen the video of Donald Wade Evanger [20]. In a spectator’s video, he’s seen operating, armed, on a riverbank away from police. When lastly confronted by police, Evanger makes an attempt to tug his gun, however will get tasered within the course of. The video is a transparent instance of correct taser utilization, demonstrating its life saving potential. Nonetheless, this incident is just mildly attention-grabbing to the general public because it doesn’t include any abrasive or surprising content material. This video at the moment has round 50 thousand views in complete.

Each Meyer and Winkfein’s encounters with the police give a one-sided view of tasers, and are well-known attributable to their extremism. Although viral movies aren’t supposed to affect public opinion, their utilization at the side of authority however does.

Different Utilization[edit]

There may be one other kind of viral video that entails tasers and stun weapons. They function younger adults in (normally) managed settings. These movies depict stun weapons both getting used for enjoyable or as an illustration; they vary from children laughing as a buddy is tased, to educated marines cringing in ache from the electrical energy surging by way of their physique. The shocked topics’ reactions are milder than the earlier movies as a result of these movies present the impact of tasers when victims anticipate the shock with no heightened anxiousness, stress, or feelings.

Future Work[edit]

Though the controversy over using tasers remains to be ongoing, as will be seen by the proof offered, the primary concern over the utilization of tasers and stun weapons is regulation and its incidence within the demise of people throughout utilization. These gadgets could also be seen by many as a viable and stronger various to different types of self protection, however solely people who’ve expertise and cautious coaching with respect to the consequences of this system must be entrusted with utilizing them. Given all of the social teams concerned, by far crucial stay the police. The expansion of the web and different media channels has offered people a way to unfold tales of brutality usually and heroism in far fewer. These channels are the best sources of affect to the general public and with additional investigation may probably reveal extra points. Future contributions might study research on taser security in additional depth, in addition to additional analysis the impression of the media, social networks, and wikipedia on society’s notion of taser use.


  1. US Patent 8843, Electrical Whaling Equipment
  2. abc Electrical Torture: A International Historical past of a Torture Know-how, Picana Electrica and different electrical system evolution historical past
  3. US Patent 427549, Electrical Prod Pole
  4. US Patent 3119554, Electrified Stick for Postmen
  5. Taser Worldwide, Firm web site
  6. Edelson, Edward (1985). [url=http://books.google.com/books?id=oQAAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA92 “Stun Guns How dangerous?”]. Well-liked Science (Bonnier Company) 227 (4): 92-93. ISSN 01617370. url=http://books.google.com/books?id=oQAAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA92. Retrieved three February 2013. 
  7. Canada TV, Tasers could cause cardiac arrest: coronary heart specialists
  8. AZ Central, Police in 5 states sue Taser in previous 2 weeks
  9. Merciad, Tasers stay a difficulty
  10. ab Annals of Emergency Medication, Security and Damage Profile of Performed Electrical Weapons Used By Regulation Enforcement Officers Towards Felony Suspects
  11. Pittsburgh Metropolis Paper Charged Debate
  12. Minneapolis Police Division TASERs: Analysis and Statistical Evaluation
  13. Taser.org.uk Preemptive tasering within the UK
  14. My San Antonio Information Cops hail Taser use, however critics aren’t bought
  15. Japanese Michigan Dangers and Advantages of Tasers
  16. American Medical Affiliation, “AMA assembly: Growing use of Tasers prompts security assessment”
  17. American Civil Liberties Union, “Unregulated Use of Taser Stun Weapons Threatens Lives, ACLU of Northern California Examine Finds”
  18. Internet Professional Information Taser Welcomes Report from Division of Protection
  19. Amnesty Worldwide Media Launch
    USA: Security of Tasers questioned as demise toll hits 334-mark
  20. East Portland Information Carjacked! Profession felony accused of stealing automobile, and groceries, at gunpoint


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *